3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 195:
Line 195: + + +
→Your block
:::Edit conflict *again*: First of all, edits are fundamentally different than blocks. It's clear that if you were to insert a spelling error, there is no conflict in me fixing it. Every editor on this site is given the "responsiblity" of editing. However, in getting "block" rights, Andy has decided that he trusts your judgment enough that you are given the "privilede" to excercise your good judement by blocking people. In undoing a ''block'' you are telling both me and Andy that your judgement is better than ours.
:::Edit conflict *again*: First of all, edits are fundamentally different than blocks. It's clear that if you were to insert a spelling error, there is no conflict in me fixing it. Every editor on this site is given the "responsiblity" of editing. However, in getting "block" rights, Andy has decided that he trusts your judgment enough that you are given the "privilede" to excercise your good judement by blocking people. In undoing a ''block'' you are telling both me and Andy that your judgement is better than ours.
:::Even though it is irrelevant (as I have shown) I can still answer your question: Have I ever undone an ''edit'' you have done? Yes I have. Have I ever undone an edit you have done while giving no explanation or reason? No, I don't think I have. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:20, 16 November 2008 (EST)
:::Even though it is irrelevant (as I have shown) I can still answer your question: Have I ever undone an ''edit'' you have done? Yes I have. Have I ever undone an edit you have done while giving no explanation or reason? No, I don't think I have. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:20, 16 November 2008 (EST)
You have certainly never given an ''adequate'' explanation. however, I am able to let the dead bury the dead. WEhat matters, as I am trying to get across to you, is the welfare of Conservapedia. I think your lenient 'name only' blocks of the two hangmen are entirely wrong for two key reasons. 1. The insults were so gross that the perpetrators do not deserve a second chance. 2. The insults, being so gross, indicate that teh perpetratorsm, if allowed back into CP, as you are in effect doing, have the potential to cause huge damage through vandalism, causing editors here an enormous amount of clean-up work.
I hope you will accept that I have not deliberately tried to edit conflict you; that is not my style. I say what I think, to you and to others. And the block was not intended to block you: I knew you would revert it post-haste. It was to get a breathing space to remove damaging saboteurs from the site. Saboteurs who you have since restored to grace. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 15:31, 16 November 2008 (EST)