Difference between revisions of "Talk:Integer"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(We need to provide simple and reliable definitions)
 
(can we use this standard?)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
We need to provide simple and reliable definitions. Students are looking to us for answers. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:27, 19 November 2008 (EST)
 
We need to provide simple and reliable definitions. Students are looking to us for answers. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:27, 19 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
I like this web site:
 +
 +
http://www.mathsisfun.com/whole-numbers.html
 +
 +
 +
Counting Numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …
 +
 +
Including zero we get Whole Numbers: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …
 +
 +
Allowing negatives => Integers: ... -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …

Revision as of 17:36, November 19, 2008

We need to provide simple and reliable definitions. Students are looking to us for answers. --Ed Poor Talk 12:27, 19 November 2008 (EST)

I like this web site:

http://www.mathsisfun.com/whole-numbers.html


Counting Numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …

Including zero we get Whole Numbers: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …

Allowing negatives => Integers: ... -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …