95
edits
Changes
→How can one state that evolution is a good theory on a website that accepts bibilican creation as fact?
:It was not a comment meant in spite. The common belief amongst Christian scientists is that Evolution is a poor theory based on misinformation and assumption. There are many reputable Christian scientists who will agree. Since this is a conservative website, I figured the general consensus of conservative scientists would be appropriate, especially since this is how facts are represented elsewhere in this website. --[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 22:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
:It was not a comment meant in spite. The common belief amongst Christian scientists is that Evolution is a poor theory based on misinformation and assumption. There are many reputable Christian scientists who will agree. Since this is a conservative website, I figured the general consensus of conservative scientists would be appropriate, especially since this is how facts are represented elsewhere in this website. --[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 22:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
::Perhaps you should reference these "conservative scientists", and be sure that their degrees are in a relevant field of science (for example, a professor of physics is not a credible source on the subject of the theory of evolution). Merely asserting that "evolution is a poor theory based on misinformation and assumption" does not make it true, and asserting that such a view is held by "the general consensus of conservative scientists" does not make that claim factual either. As it is, getting information about the theory of evolution from Conservapedia is like getting information about responsible firearms usage from Gunguys.com. You are offering uninformed and demonstratably biased assertions as fact. [[User:Dimensio|Dimensio]] 12:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Evolution is the accepted theory in the scientific community because it is a falsifiable theory. Something Creationism is not. Moreover, it is as valid as any other currently accepted scientific theory. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 22:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Evolution is the accepted theory in the scientific community because it is a falsifiable theory. Something Creationism is not. Moreover, it is as valid as any other currently accepted scientific theory. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 22:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Evolution is a valid theory, and I know this. It is not a good theory though. I give it as an example of a theory that does not have a good solid base of fact into which it can support itself. The theory of the flying spaghetti monster is a valid theory also. it's just not a very good one. --[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 22:21, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Evolution is a valid theory, and I know this. It is not a good theory though. I give it as an example of a theory that does not have a good solid base of fact into which it can support itself. The theory of the flying spaghetti monster is a valid theory also. it's just not a very good one. --[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 22:21, 14 March 2007 (EDT)