Changes

++actions taken in response to your concerns ++in agreement with Anthony Standen addition
Line 1: Line 1:  
This article has too much fluff. I bet most of the info is identical to what reader could find at any bookselling website like Amazon. Can you boil it down to its essence? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:12, 2 December 2008 (EST)
 
This article has too much fluff. I bet most of the info is identical to what reader could find at any bookselling website like Amazon. Can you boil it down to its essence? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:12, 2 December 2008 (EST)
 +
*My transforming the list of review citations to a ref and stating that the book was widely reviewed is an attempt to make the article more encyclopedic and less like something one would find at Amazon. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 11:37, 2 December 2008 (EST)
1,887

edits