Difference between revisions of "Talk:Logic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Falconcomeon (talk | contribs) (→Logic and religion: new section) |
(confusion of terminology) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think there should be a section on logic and how it is used (or not) in a religious context, but I don't know how to start a passage on it--[[User:Falconcomeon|Falconcomeon]] 18:00, 30 July 2008 (EDT) | I think there should be a section on logic and how it is used (or not) in a religious context, but I don't know how to start a passage on it--[[User:Falconcomeon|Falconcomeon]] 18:00, 30 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==[[Modern logic]]== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I know of only two kinds of logic: | ||
| + | * the propositional calculus (If A then B; but not B; hence not A) | ||
| + | * the syllogism (All men are mortal; Socrates is a men; hence Socrates is mortal) | ||
| + | |||
| + | We need to tighten up our terminology: | ||
| + | *[[formal logic]] | ||
| + | *[[classical logic]] | ||
| + | *[[symbolic logic]] | ||
| + | *[[propositional calculus]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[syllogism]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | What does everything redirect to? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:24, 8 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:24, December 8, 2008
"Come, let us reason together, saith the Lord." --Ed Poor 16:31, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Logic and religion
I think there should be a section on logic and how it is used (or not) in a religious context, but I don't know how to start a passage on it--Falconcomeon 18:00, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
Modern logic
I know of only two kinds of logic:
- the propositional calculus (If A then B; but not B; hence not A)
- the syllogism (All men are mortal; Socrates is a men; hence Socrates is mortal)
We need to tighten up our terminology:
What does everything redirect to? --Ed Poor Talk 13:24, 8 December 2008 (EST)