Changes

415 bytes added ,  16:31, December 11, 2008
Line 188: Line 188:     
Thank you for the prompt & courteous response.  I would argue that if we can say in the main article that he might be a Muslim, then we should be allowed to say that elsewhere on CP too.  (After all, if we can't say it here, where ''can'' we say it?)  However, I will be bound by your command.  [[User:GloriaL|GloriaL]] 11:17, 11 December 2008 (EST)
 
Thank you for the prompt & courteous response.  I would argue that if we can say in the main article that he might be a Muslim, then we should be allowed to say that elsewhere on CP too.  (After all, if we can't say it here, where ''can'' we say it?)  However, I will be bound by your command.  [[User:GloriaL|GloriaL]] 11:17, 11 December 2008 (EST)
 +
:In a way,I honestly do not mind (he is not my President, in any event), but your reply answers your own question. There is a difference between saying he 'might' be a Muslim and listing it as 'fact' under "Prominent Muslims". Maybe "Prominent Suspected Muslims" but let us rather not go down that road. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]</sup> 11:31, 11 December 2008 (EST)
    
== I object! ==
 
== I object! ==
    
I submit that the "related" link to the Arab-American entry be removed, because it is suggesting that all arabs are muslim, when you can consider anyone from the Arab Penisula and Arab. This includes Israel.
 
I submit that the "related" link to the Arab-American entry be removed, because it is suggesting that all arabs are muslim, when you can consider anyone from the Arab Penisula and Arab. This includes Israel.
4,336

edits