Difference between revisions of "Talk:Formal logic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Question: how to proceed?) |
(article split approved) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The first bit contains examples (ill-formed ones, at that!) of ''categorical'' logic, or the Aristotelian Syllogistic, not what these days is called ''symbolic'' logic, or the Propositional Calculus. Do we want to split the article, or should I just replace the bad examples with relevant ones? | The first bit contains examples (ill-formed ones, at that!) of ''categorical'' logic, or the Aristotelian Syllogistic, not what these days is called ''symbolic'' logic, or the Propositional Calculus. Do we want to split the article, or should I just replace the bad examples with relevant ones? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Split it, please! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:54, 15 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:54, December 16, 2008
Symbolic vs. Categorical Logic
The first bit contains examples (ill-formed ones, at that!) of categorical logic, or the Aristotelian Syllogistic, not what these days is called symbolic logic, or the Propositional Calculus. Do we want to split the article, or should I just replace the bad examples with relevant ones?