Difference between revisions of "Talk:Formal logic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(article split approved) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Split it, please! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:54, 15 December 2008 (EST) | :Split it, please! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:54, 15 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Ed, I'm going to be out of town for a few days, but I'll work as I have time. Obviously this project intersects with the [[Logic]] article, too, so I'll be making changes there as well. [[User:StevenK|StevenK]] 23:06, 16 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:06, December 17, 2008
Symbolic vs. Categorical Logic
The first bit contains examples (ill-formed ones, at that!) of categorical logic, or the Aristotelian Syllogistic, not what these days is called symbolic logic, or the Propositional Calculus. Do we want to split the article, or should I just replace the bad examples with relevant ones?