Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Proposed Dispute Resolution Process"
Hojimachong (Talk | contribs) |
Hojimachong (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::: Sure, they'll be as unbiased as anyone. Perhaps a separate page should be set up for arguments. Feel free to move stuff from this page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:01, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ::: Sure, they'll be as unbiased as anyone. Perhaps a separate page should be set up for arguments. Feel free to move stuff from this page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:01, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Discussion== | ||
| + | ===Support=== | ||
| + | ===Oppose=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Alternative Suggestions== | ||
Revision as of 03:06, March 23, 2007
Contents
Original Discussion from Aschlafly's Talk Page
Dispute Resolution Procedure
I think the best way to handle disputes and choose a logo is for me to step aside and allow a panel of the students who helped found this site decide these matters. None of these individuals are related to me and I have disagreed with some of them in the past. They don't have any ax to grind. They deserve a key role in deciding direction here.
They will first pick a logo, taking into the account the recent revelation that the defacing of the leading choice may have been by the designer himself. Next they will resolve the dispute over The Theory of Evolution page. I don't know what or how they will decide but I am confident that this is the most fair way to resolve this. I agree beforehand to abide by their decision and trust everyone else here will also. Thank you.--Aschlafly 22:36, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- I think that sounds like an excellent plan. MountainDew 22:40, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Seems like the Arbitration committee. I hope that each party involved will be able to state their arguments and opinions, and citations they wish to use, etc. Also, will the homeschoolers who founded the site be able to make decisions based on the Commandments, rather than their own personal biases? --Hojimachongtalk 22:42, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Sure, they'll be as unbiased as anyone. Perhaps a separate page should be set up for arguments. Feel free to move stuff from this page.--Aschlafly 23:01, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
