Changes

1 byte removed ,  12:42, March 23, 2007
m
no edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:  
Thus, all these references are to a ''generalised concept'', applicable to anybody who is 'anti (i.e. against) Christ', ''not'' to a particular person. Moreover, they make it clear that such 'antichrists' were already present in the world nearly two thousand years ago.
 
Thus, all these references are to a ''generalised concept'', applicable to anybody who is 'anti (i.e. against) Christ', ''not'' to a particular person. Moreover, they make it clear that such 'antichrists' were already present in the world nearly two thousand years ago.
   −
There are ''no'' other references to the term in the Bible. Neither the book of Daniel nor St John's Revelation (both of them controversial in their own right) mentions the concept at all. Thus, if [[Christian]]s choose to link it to anything there, it is they who are making the link, not the Bible.
+
There are ''no'' other references to the term in the Bible. Neither the book of Daniel nor St John's Revelation (both of them controversial in their own right) mention the concept at all. Thus, if [[Christian]]s choose to link it to anything there, it is they who are making the link, not the Bible.
    
==Sources==
 
==Sources==