Changes

1,996 bytes added ,  05:06, January 8, 2009
→‎Australia: "You keep using that word..."
Line 96: Line 96:     
::: Your rant is bizarre; it only reinforces that Australia is significantly more rural than the U.S.  Taken in the context of crime rates, the "far more rural" description is apt.  You have not suggested an improvement.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:01, 7 January 2009 (EST)
 
::: Your rant is bizarre; it only reinforces that Australia is significantly more rural than the U.S.  Taken in the context of crime rates, the "far more rural" description is apt.  You have not suggested an improvement.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:01, 7 January 2009 (EST)
 +
::::Please don’t be insulting.  It was not a rant.  I was (and am) quite calm and rational.  Maybe the station/Texas comparison in the middle made it a little disjointed, but that is no excuse for calling it bizarre.  I was pointing out that Australia’s rural areas are extremely sparsely populated and you say that this reinforces that Australia is significantly more rural than the USA, which makes no sense.  The fact is that even in Australia’s remote areas, most of the population is concentrated in mining towns and such, and is therefore not rural.  So the statistic of 12% for Australia was extremely generous as it could well be a mere fraction of that, in which case Australia is less rural than USA.
 +
 +
Whatever the context, a description is not apt if it is not accurate, and you have not in any way shown it to be accurate.  If you wish to reflect the overall comparative crime rates, then maybe you should do so explicitly.
 +
 +
Can I perhaps ask you to clearly define what you mean by the statement that Australia is far more rural than the USA?  I would have thought it referred to the percentage of the population that are in rural communities (as defined by the predominant activities of the community), but perhaps you are referring to something else.
 +
 +
Also, I didn’t suggest an improvement because I made the change to the article myself, as you well know because you censored it.  But if you want a suggestion, either state the truth about comparative “rurality” or excise the statement altogether.
 +
 +
By the way, the article is attempting to make the case that gun control has effected Australian crime, culture and politics over the last decade or so but why should the effect start then, when gun control has been pretty tight for several decades at least?  In the 1950’s in Western Australia my father had to fill out a form at the local police station before he could buy ammunition for his rifles (.303 and .22).[[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 00:06, 8 January 2009 (EST)
    
==Loss of the frontier spirit to urban "values" ==
 
==Loss of the frontier spirit to urban "values" ==
Block, SkipCaptcha
195

edits