Difference between revisions of "Scientific uncertainty"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(interpretation is influenced by the individual’s point of view, which can become thoroughly entangled with the science)
(template jammed)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{quotation|Ambiguity requires interpretation. And interpretation is influenced by the individual’s point of view, which can become thoroughly entangled with the science. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=eating-made-simple Scientific American] }}
+
An article in ''[[Scientific American]]'' said:
 +
:Ambiguity requires interpretation. And interpretation is influenced by the individual’s point of view, which can become thoroughly entangled with the science. [http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=eating-made-simple Scientific American]
  
 
See: [[medical uncertainty]]
 
See: [[medical uncertainty]]

Revision as of 23:47, January 9, 2009

An article in Scientific American said:

Ambiguity requires interpretation. And interpretation is influenced by the individual’s point of view, which can become thoroughly entangled with the science. Scientific American

See: medical uncertainty