Difference between revisions of "False Dilemma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(not all dilemmas are false dilemmas) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''False dilemma''' is a [[logic]]al fallacy in which | + | '''False dilemma''' is a [[logic]]al fallacy in which a set of options are presented as if they are mutually exclusive or as if they're the only possible options, when in fact they are not. <ref>http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/itl/graphics/adhom/dilemma.html</ref> It is used to give the impression that if one rejects another's argument, he must necessarily embrace an absurd or unappealing stance. |
| − | An example of a false | + | A false dichotomy is a special case of a false dilemma, in which only two options are presented. |
| + | |||
| + | An example of a false dichotomy is the argument "if you oppose [[Barack Obama]], you're a racist!" It is a false dichotomy because it ignores many possible reasons for opposing Obama. | ||
Of course, not all dilemmas are false dilemmas. | Of course, not all dilemmas are false dilemmas. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
[[Category:philosophy]] | [[Category:philosophy]] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Logical Fallacies]] |
Revision as of 18:04, January 15, 2009
False dilemma is a logical fallacy in which a set of options are presented as if they are mutually exclusive or as if they're the only possible options, when in fact they are not. [1] It is used to give the impression that if one rejects another's argument, he must necessarily embrace an absurd or unappealing stance.
A false dichotomy is a special case of a false dilemma, in which only two options are presented.
An example of a false dichotomy is the argument "if you oppose Barack Obama, you're a racist!" It is a false dichotomy because it ignores many possible reasons for opposing Obama.
Of course, not all dilemmas are false dilemmas.