Difference between revisions of "Talk:Flying ace"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(And I certainly welcome others.)
(I saw the movie last night. Technically, he (she?) is an ace, too.)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:I wouldn't have put him in if I didn't think he belonged, but I do admit he's not exactly in the same class as the others.  But I figure that his flying ace persona is iconic enough that he at least deserves a mention.  And it helps lighten the mood of the article.  That's my opinion, anyway.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 16:50, 30 December 2008 (EST)
 
:I wouldn't have put him in if I didn't think he belonged, but I do admit he's not exactly in the same class as the others.  But I figure that his flying ace persona is iconic enough that he at least deserves a mention.  And it helps lighten the mood of the article.  That's my opinion, anyway.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 16:50, 30 December 2008 (EST)
 +
:Hey, c'mon.  At least I didn't include [[Rodan]].--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 18:10, 1 February 2009 (EST)

Latest revision as of 23:10, February 1, 2009

Does Snoopy really belong here? JY23 14:26, 30 December 2008 (EST)

I wouldn't have put him in if I didn't think he belonged, but I do admit he's not exactly in the same class as the others. But I figure that his flying ace persona is iconic enough that he at least deserves a mention. And it helps lighten the mood of the article. That's my opinion, anyway.--Frey 16:50, 30 December 2008 (EST)
Hey, c'mon. At least I didn't include Rodan.--Frey 18:10, 1 February 2009 (EST)