Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobertWDP"
(You didn't get a proper welcome, Waddell...I am remedying that!) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::My apologies TK; I assumed that Conservapedia's stated POV was similar to that of CreationWiki, which explicitly endorses YEC. I'll keep that in mind. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 17:55, 24 February 2009 (EST) | ::My apologies TK; I assumed that Conservapedia's stated POV was similar to that of CreationWiki, which explicitly endorses YEC. I'll keep that in mind. --[[User:Economist|Economist]] 17:55, 24 February 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Global Warming== | ||
| + | Are you sure you want to edit this page further? You are obviously in disagreement with what is presented. The entire page is a rebuke of global warming orthodoxy. Maybe you should start a counter-arguments page.--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 13:04, 2 March 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:04, March 2, 2009
Welcome!
Hello, RobertWDP, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, RobertWDP!
Your edits are not primarily "factual;" they take issue with the presentation of the subject, which is based on ideological premises. Note that Conservapedia does not support a Neutral Point of View (NPOV) like Wikipedia does, but rather a conservative, Christian, YEC one. --Economist 17:42, 24 February 2009 (EST)
- Had to (above strike), Economist, as Mr. Schlafly maintains that will not be our emphasis, insofar as religion goes. --₮K/Admin/Talk 17:48, 24 February 2009 (EST)
- My apologies TK; I assumed that Conservapedia's stated POV was similar to that of CreationWiki, which explicitly endorses YEC. I'll keep that in mind. --Economist 17:55, 24 February 2009 (EST)
Global Warming
Are you sure you want to edit this page further? You are obviously in disagreement with what is presented. The entire page is a rebuke of global warming orthodoxy. Maybe you should start a counter-arguments page.--jpatt 13:04, 2 March 2009 (EST)
