Difference between revisions of "Talk:Integral"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.--[[User:Mathoreilly|Mathoreilly]] 13:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 
This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.--[[User:Mathoreilly|Mathoreilly]] 13:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
This page should be merged it seems with the Reimann Integral page. --[[User:Qwestor|Qwestor]] 16:40, 2 March 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 21:39, March 2, 2009

This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.--Mathoreilly 13:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

This page should be merged it seems with the Reimann Integral page. --Qwestor 16:40, 2 March 2009 (EST)