Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: − + + + + + +
it requires that a human life be killed
==Controversy==
==Controversy==
[[Pro-life]] conservatives consider taking stem cells from human embryos tantamount to [[abortion]], as a potential human life is ended. Many [[liberals]], on the other hand, claim that the embryos used for stem cell research are already condemned to death because most of them are the byproduct of [[in vitro fertilization]] procedures which generate many more embryos than are needed to implant in the woman. With no further use for these embryos, they are often destroyed. Thus, liberals claim that embryonic stem cell research does not result in the destruction of any additional embryos. <ref>http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/18/4/672</ref> Conservative argue that this reasoning fails to mention that embryos can be adopted <ref>http://www.embryoadoption.org/</ref> and thus saved from destruction.
[[Pro-life]] conservatives consider taking stem cells from human embryos tantamount to [[abortion]], as a potential human life is ended.
: Those who value human life from the point of [[conception]], oppose embryonic stem cell research because the extraction of stem cells from this type of an embryo requires its destruction. In other words, it requires that a [[human life]] be killed.<ref> [http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/pros-and-cons-of-stem-cell-research.htm Pros And Cons Of Stem Cell Research]</ref>
Many [[liberals]], on the other hand, claim that the embryos used for stem cell research are already condemned to death because most of them are the byproduct of [[in vitro fertilization]] procedures which generate many more embryos than are needed to implant in the woman. With no further use for these embryos, they are often destroyed. Thus, liberals claim that embryonic stem cell research does not result in the destruction of any additional embryos. <ref>http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/18/4/672</ref> Conservative argue that this reasoning fails to mention that embryos can be adopted <ref>http://www.embryoadoption.org/</ref> and thus saved from destruction.
==References==
==References==