Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spanish language"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
^This statement needs to be substantiated by references from peer-reviewed linguistics research or removed. I vote to remove it until it can be supported.  [[User:nireboi99|nireboi99]]
 
^This statement needs to be substantiated by references from peer-reviewed linguistics research or removed. I vote to remove it until it can be supported.  [[User:nireboi99|nireboi99]]
 +
 +
I agree; I vote also to remove the sentence. Ease of learning a language is a completely personal thing, plus I consider this to be very vague Anglocentrism, because it suggests that English is more complex, and therefore more sophisticated.

Revision as of 01:51, April 24, 2009

This article could use some work... What all should an article on a language include? Grammar structure? Past, present, future tenses? Pronouns? I'll start working on this tomorrow, if I get a chance. GodlessLiberal 16:12, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

Arabic influences on Spanish

For anyone wanting to expand on the Arabic influences on Spanish, a reference - http://www2.ignatius.edu/faculty/turner/arabicspanish.htm --Mtur 23:32, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

Claims about "complexity"

"It is more difficult for native Spanish speakers to learn English than it is for native English speakers to learn Spanish, due to the complexity and inconsistency of English grammar compared to Spanish grammar."

^This statement needs to be substantiated by references from peer-reviewed linguistics research or removed. I vote to remove it until it can be supported. nireboi99

I agree; I vote also to remove the sentence. Ease of learning a language is a completely personal thing, plus I consider this to be very vague Anglocentrism, because it suggests that English is more complex, and therefore more sophisticated.