Difference between revisions of "Gravitation"
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
==Microgravity versus Macrogravity== | ==Microgravity versus Macrogravity== | ||
| − | Microgravity is the attractions we experience on an everyday basis, such as things falling to the earth. There is an abundance of evidence to support the phenomenon of microgravity. However, macrogravity, the attraction of large celestial bodies, has never been adequately proven, and it is more or less equally likely that a different force (e.g. electromagnetism, a hypothetical "God force," etc.) is holding solar systems and galaxies together. Liberal astronomers however do not acknowledge this. | + | Microgravity is the attractions we experience on an everyday basis, such as things falling to the earth. There is an abundance of evidence to support the phenomenon of microgravity. However, macrogravity, the attraction of large celestial bodies, has never been adequately proven, and it is more or less equally likely that a different force (e.g. electromagnetism, a hypothetical "God force," etc.) is holding solar systems and galaxies together. Liberal astronomers however do not acknowledge this.<ref>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/28ebb87902c8ecba?dmode=source&hl=en&pli=1</ref> |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 21:16, April 25, 2009
The theory of Gravity is a naturalistic explanation for the mutual attraction of particles that contain mass (this refers to the theory of gravity which employs methodological naturalism and is taught in schools and universities). Before general relativity, gravitation was described by Isaac Newton's naturalistic law of universal gravitation in his Principia Mathematica. Issac Newton's theory of gravity cannot explain the permutations of space and time as velocity of an object approaches the speed of light. Aristotle, and other previous thinkers and scientists before Newton never proposed a mathematic explanation for attraction of masses.
Everything in the universe that has mass attracts every other thing that has mass. The mechanism which transports this force has never been observed. Scientists have postulated the existence of a hypothetical particle, the graviton, in order to uphold the naturalistic explanation absent of a supernatural force. The attraction depends on the mass of the objects and the distance between them. For normal objects, this pull is minute, but you can measure the pull between a very large object like the Earth and another object like you by standing on a scale. Your weight is the measure of the pull of gravity between you and the planet you are standing on. This force depends on your mass and the mass of that planet, but it also depends on your distance from the center of the planet. The further you are from the planet's center, the weaker the pull between it and your body. If you double your distance, the force is one quarter. At ten times the distance, the force is one hundredth. It drops off with the square of the distance. This is called the inverse square law.[1]The force never becomes zero, no matter how far you travel.
The law itself states that each particle in the universe attracts another particle with a force directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them[2], or:
Where:
F is the magnitude of the gravitational force.
m1 and m2 are the object's masses.
r is the distance that separates the objects' centers of mass.
G is the gravitational constant: 6.67428x10-11 N m2 Kg -2
Gravitation is responsible for making objects accelerate towards each other as well as for the formation of the Earth and Sun, the stars and the planets.
An objects escape speed is the velocity required to escape the gravitational pull of a another object, usually a planet. It can be expressed as:
Where:
v is necessary velocity
M is the mass of the planet
R is the radius of the planet
G is the gravitational constant: 6.67428x10-11 N m2 Kg -2
Contents
Gravity and Modern Physics
Newton's Theory of Gravity was one of the supposed earliest triumphs of modern physics. It now stands as both one of the most successful and most mysterious areas of that field. It is one of the few scientific theories that does not require a supernatural force to sustain self consistency. On one hand, the General theory of Relativity is one of the most successful scientific theories to date. On the other hand, how General Relativity might be reconciled with quantum physics during the first few milliseconds of the Big Bang remains an open question, and is one of the hotly contested areas among modern theoretical physicists. In the 1980s string theory was seen by many physicists as a more likely path towards a particular unification of gravity with the other fundamental forces (electromagnetism, the strong and weak nuclear forces), but the theory has been a failure.[3]
The theory of gravity is not falsifiable. Various extensions such as dark matter and dark energy have been proposed (with very little supporting evidence) to combat various fundamental problems in the theory of gravity, and as such, gravity is not a valid scientific theory.[4]
Microgravity versus Macrogravity
Microgravity is the attractions we experience on an everyday basis, such as things falling to the earth. There is an abundance of evidence to support the phenomenon of microgravity. However, macrogravity, the attraction of large celestial bodies, has never been adequately proven, and it is more or less equally likely that a different force (e.g. electromagnetism, a hypothetical "God force," etc.) is holding solar systems and galaxies together. Liberal astronomers however do not acknowledge this.[5]
See also
External Links
References
- ↑ http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/isq.html
- ↑ Serway and Beichner, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Fifth Edition
- ↑ Not Even Wrong, Peter Woit [1]
- ↑ http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=does-dark-matter-really-e
- ↑ http://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/28ebb87902c8ecba?dmode=source&hl=en&pli=1
