Changes

Since the beginning of modern science, scientists have worked under the assumption that their subjects of study have been controlled by consistent natural laws.

Since the beginning of modern science, scientists have worked under the assumption that their subjects of study have been controlled by consistent natural laws.

There is good evidence that this assumption was based on the [[Christianity|Christian]] view that the laws were created by a consistent creator Who didn't change those laws on a whim.<ref>See [[Natural science#Beginnings]]</ref>

There is good evidence that this assumption was based on the [[Christianity|Christian]] view that the laws were created by a consistent creator Who didn't change those laws on a whim.<ref>See [[Natural science#Beginnings]]</ref>

This assumption is seen as a prerequisite for logical deduction to act on the observations made. Without the assumption that the universe is consistent we cannot apply the lessons drawn from an observation to any area other than the observations themselves. If a [[chemical reaction]] occurs in a given solution in a laboratory in one city it is assumed that the same reaction can occur in a different laboratory in a different city on a different day because the chemical [[solution]] and situations will be the same.However now science is used by opinionated atheist and liberals as an excuse to deny the miracles of God and denounce important christian views such as the creation of the world, as told in Genesis. Furthermore some "scientist" are using science to claim outragous lies such as homosexuality is not a choice, which clearly goes against what is said in the bible, the absolute word of God.

This assumption is seen as a prerequisite for logical deduction to act on the observations made. Without the assumption that the universe is consistent we cannot apply the lessons drawn from an observation to any area other than the observations themselves. If a [[chemical reaction]] occurs in a given solution in a laboratory in one city it is assumed that the same reaction can occur in a different laboratory in a different city on a different day because the chemical [[solution]] and situations will be the same.

If a capricious supernatural force was to enter the equation they could not be controlled for and could not be studied. This system in science is set up so that godless scientist can use this system to deny God for the various deeds he does. In fact some scientist will go even further to denounce God by claiming that some carbon dating nonsense proves that the earth is much older than it is as stated in Genesis, claiming that their carbon dating is more trustworthy than the infallible word of God.

If a capricious supernatural force was to enter the equation they could not be controlled for and could not be studied.

The physical sciences largely concern themselves with questions involving the natural, not the supernatural, but this is not the same as assuming that the supernatural does not exist.  In addition, there are also the social sciences like [[history]].  [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]] maintain that history testifies to the supernatural existing and that the physical sciences (such as [[Biblical archaeology]]) can aid in historical determinations and testify to the existence of God and the truth of biblical Christianity.   

The physical sciences largely concern themselves with questions involving the natural, not the supernatural, but this is not the same as assuming that the supernatural does not exist.  In addition, there are also the social sciences like [[history]].  [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]] maintain that history testifies to the supernatural existing and that the physical sciences (such as [[Biblical archaeology]]) can aid in historical determinations and testify to the existence of God and the truth of biblical Christianity.