: Done, six minutes after your request. Not bad, eh? It's unlocked for general editing now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:51, 11 April 2009 (EDT)
==Endorsement==
The introduction to Wikipedia's own "Criticism of Wikipedia" entry reads, "The Seigenthaler and Essjay incidents caused criticism of Wikipedia's reliability and usefulness as a reference." Googles return some 74,000 hits for "Essjay." Wikipedia's attempts to rewrite its own history are well known. Conservapedia's entry on Wikipedia, [http://www.conservapedia.com/Wikipedia#cite_note-135 footnote 136] {[http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=2778&st=0&p=20992&#entry20992 original source]) refers to the site admin at Wikipediareview who blow the Essjay fraud wide open, exposed the scandal, provoked the international condemnation and flight of experts and academics who washed thier hands of the project. This site admins name is Somey. Of all the apologetics, coverups & disinformation abundant, Somey has now said about Conservapedia's entry on Wikipedia, "their version of the Essjay story is one of the more accurate ones I've seen."
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia] [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)