Changes

User talk:Chippeterson (view source)

Revision as of 04:18, July 19, 2009

1,587 bytes removed , 04:18, July 19, 2009

Line 226: Line 226:

Better check your sources again....Alan Cranston preceded her in the Senate! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]/Admin[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]] 22:20, 11 June 2009 (EDT)

−

~~== Please... ==~~

−

I don't seek a confrontation, you are a valued contributor, but Chip, Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative? That edit, and some other recent ones of yours that I have reverted, make me think you are sourcing liberals for that kind of revisionist thinking! --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]/Admin[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]] 22:31, 18 July 2009 (EDT)

−

:TK, there's no sarcasm here, but when you asked the question "Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?" that sounds as if your saying I wrote that Ronald Reagan was not a fiscal conservative, I wrote that he is. Then a user who has a history of committing vandalism took my edit off, and you changed it back. Just what are you implying? Also, I checked out your recent contributions and you have not reverted any of my edits. Is this for real or is this some kind of a joke? [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] July 18, 2009

−

::No joke, just my being distracted and confused about where I was posting, I guess. I can see that you were indeed the placer of the category, not the idiot I blocked for removing it.....sorry. The only reversion I have done of your edits had to do with Sarah Palin, and it was minor. I will pay better attention before posting in the future, Chip. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]/Admin[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]] 23:35, 18 July 2009 (EDT)

−

~~I understand going after the constant vandals on this site can get distracting, thanks for clarifying TK. [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] July 18, 2009~~

Chippeterson

Siteadmin, oversight, Administrators

5,098

edits