Difference between revisions of "Talk:Theory of relativity/draft"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I believe Andrew would want us to state that the Theory of Relativity is a materalistic theory like the theory of evolution.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 16:42, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | I believe Andrew would want us to state that the Theory of Relativity is a materalistic theory like the theory of evolution.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 16:42, 27 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I look forward to seeing the end result. There should be no issue here, as physics is physics.[[User:Palmd001|PalMD]] | ||
Revision as of 20:51, March 27, 2007
In case anyone is wondering why this page exists, I'm writing a new version of this article, in an attempt to make it more scientifically sound. Geekman314(contact me) 11:40, 10 March 2007 (EST)
Is anyone going to add anything of substance? It only has 4 sentences, and it is misleading already. RSchlafly 16:30, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
I'll take a crack at it now. I have a basic understanding of special relativity. Its a very tough cookie to crack though and without delving into huge scientific proofs its hard to explain properly! I shall give it my best though. MatteeNeutra 16:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
I believe Andrew would want us to state that the Theory of Relativity is a materalistic theory like the theory of evolution.--TimS 16:42, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
I look forward to seeing the end result. There should be no issue here, as physics is physics.PalMD