Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sacha Baron Cohen"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Anagram)
(Anagram)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Borat is a common Slavic name, which is why it was chosen for this movie.  It has nothing to do with being an anagram of "abort". --[[User:ERiggs|ERiggs]] 16:06, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
 
Borat is a common Slavic name, which is why it was chosen for this movie.  It has nothing to do with being an anagram of "abort". --[[User:ERiggs|ERiggs]] 16:06, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
 
:They could have easily chosen any other common Slavic name. [[User:TimH|TimH]] 17:20, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
 
:They could have easily chosen any other common Slavic name. [[User:TimH|TimH]] 17:20, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
::Would you make the same calim about the Taxpayer Bill of Rights -- TABOR? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 17:22, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
+
::Would you make the same claim about the Taxpayer Bill of Rights -- TABOR? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 17:22, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
  
 
== Why delete? ==
 
== Why delete? ==
 
This article concerns a valid, noteworthy topic of interest to conservatives. You may not agree with the subject, or its presentation, but is that really the criteria for removal? Conservatives, too, might want to know what the controversy is. [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 11:44, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
This article concerns a valid, noteworthy topic of interest to conservatives. You may not agree with the subject, or its presentation, but is that really the criteria for removal? Conservatives, too, might want to know what the controversy is. [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 11:44, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:22, September 27, 2009

Anagram

Borat is a common Slavic name, which is why it was chosen for this movie. It has nothing to do with being an anagram of "abort". --ERiggs 16:06, 27 September 2009 (EDT)

They could have easily chosen any other common Slavic name. TimH 17:20, 27 September 2009 (EDT)
Would you make the same claim about the Taxpayer Bill of Rights -- TABOR? Wayne 17:22, 27 September 2009 (EDT)

Why delete?

This article concerns a valid, noteworthy topic of interest to conservatives. You may not agree with the subject, or its presentation, but is that really the criteria for removal? Conservatives, too, might want to know what the controversy is. Menkatron 11:44, 15 March 2007 (EDT)