1,971
edits
Changes
User talk:CPWebmaster/Archive1 (view source)
Revision as of 19:16, March 28, 2007
, 19:16, March 28, 2007rm </div>s... while not technically correct, it renders the same, and makes it so that users who use the "+" button won't muck up the bottom of the page
It would be helpful to have a Debate namespace for these pages. People keep mistaking them for normal articles. I've created a template to prevent that, but it requires editors creating new topics to do so correctly, or someone else to fix them later. A dedicated namespace would make life a little easier, and it may even be possible to write a Special page to automatically catalogue them. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 08:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
It would be helpful to have a Debate namespace for these pages. People keep mistaking them for normal articles. I've created a template to prevent that, but it requires editors creating new topics to do so correctly, or someone else to fix them later. A dedicated namespace would make life a little easier, and it may even be possible to write a Special page to automatically catalogue them. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 08:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
== [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] ==
== [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] ==
I see that [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] was deleted... is there a better place to request unprotection of pages once their problems have passed? Currently, it seems like there are a number of pages that remain protected for a very long time without an obvious reason (eg. [[Jesus]] for 33 days with an edit summary of "temporary protection", [[abortion]] for 26 days, [[George W. Bush]] for 16 days, [[Talk:Canadian newspapers]] for 16 days, [[Dick Cheney]] for 14 days, [[Biblical creation account]] for 14 days, [[Talk:18 USC § 1030]] for 9 days, [[Fox News Channel]] for 9 days with an edit summary of "Will remove in couple of days", etc...). Without users being able to point these out, it seems likely that they'd remain protected for an extended period of time. If there's no other better venue, could [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] be restored? --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 14:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
I see that [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] was deleted... is there a better place to request unprotection of pages once their problems have passed? Currently, it seems like there are a number of pages that remain protected for a very long time without an obvious reason (eg. [[Jesus]] for 33 days with an edit summary of "temporary protection", [[abortion]] for 26 days, [[George W. Bush]] for 16 days, [[Talk:Canadian newspapers]] for 16 days, [[Dick Cheney]] for 14 days, [[Biblical creation account]] for 14 days, [[Talk:18 USC § 1030]] for 9 days, [[Fox News Channel]] for 9 days with an edit summary of "Will remove in couple of days", etc...). Without users being able to point these out, it seems likely that they'd remain protected for an extended period of time. If there's no other better venue, could [[Conservapedia:Request Unprotection]] be restored? --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 14:53, 28 March 2007 (EDT)