Changes

Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)

Revision as of 03:42, October 9, 2009

769 bytes added , 03:42, October 9, 2009

Line 620: Line 620:

::Perhaps someone else can provide a more substantive response. [[User:JasonS|JasonS]] 22:24, 8 October 2009 (EDT) (formerly Reaganetics)

+

:::JasonS, you say only that ''you'' "might be wrong." You apparently won't concede that the theory of evolution might be wrong. Atheists, for example, insist that the theory of evolution must be true regardless of how many counterexamples are shown to them. They are not open to the possibility that the theory of evolution might be false.

+

:::If you're not open-minded about the issue, then it's not an intelligent discussion. It's a fool's errand. There are nearly 40 counterexamples listed and your objections above to a mere half-dozen are plainly deficient. If you demonstrate an open mind then I'd be happy to discuss further; otherwise my time is obviously better spent elsewhere. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:42, 8 October 2009 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,231

edits