24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 89:
Line 89: + + +
→Reliable Sources?
Is there any information from other sources pending to allegations of terrorism or human trafficking from sources other than the State Department? If there is I can't find any. So is all that information extremely relevant of reliable?
Is there any information from other sources pending to allegations of terrorism or human trafficking from sources other than the State Department? If there is I can't find any. So is all that information extremely relevant of reliable?
::Please don't erase information you don't like. Instead, if you know some reliable sources with conservative information, please provide them. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 17:13, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
::Please don't erase information you don't like. Instead, if you know some reliable sources with conservative information, please provide them. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 17:13, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
:The word of one man is hardly a reliable source that you have cited. There was no election fraud. I simply erased it as it had no basis in fact. The election was verified by the Venezuelan government (without controversy claimed) and many international observers (including those from Canada.) I was simply removing information that was by any standard unacceptable and uncredited.
--[[User:Cidd11|Cidd11]] 17:23, 16 October 2009 (EDT)