1,792
edits
Changes
Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)
Revision as of 04:27, October 17, 2009
, 04:27, October 17, 2009→Quantum Field Theory/Changes to the Intro: The CP relativity article is filled with errors
:::::: I looked at your reference and found nothing relevant to this discussion, and you quoted nothing. In sum, relativity has yielded nothing productive, and neither is this discussion. Every minute spent on discussing relativity is a wasted minute, and every dollar spent is a wasted dollar. Relativity is based entirely on sweeping and implausible assumptions unlike any other theory of physics. Suit yourself if you like relativity, but you're wasting your time and please don't waste any more taxpayer dollars on it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:01, 17 October 2009 (EDT)
:::::: I looked at your reference and found nothing relevant to this discussion, and you quoted nothing. In sum, relativity has yielded nothing productive, and neither is this discussion. Every minute spent on discussing relativity is a wasted minute, and every dollar spent is a wasted dollar. Relativity is based entirely on sweeping and implausible assumptions unlike any other theory of physics. Suit yourself if you like relativity, but you're wasting your time and please don't waste any more taxpayer dollars on it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:01, 17 October 2009 (EDT)
::::::: You complain that relativity is different from Newtonian physics, and then you fail to see the relevance of what Newton said about the principle of relativity. I give up. The CP relativity article is filled with errors. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 00:27, 17 October 2009 (EDT)