24
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 92:
Line 92: +
→Reliable Sources?
:The word of one man is hardly a reliable source that you have cited. There was no election fraud. I simply erased it as it had no basis in fact. The election was verified by the Venezuelan government (without controversy claimed) and many international observers (including those from Canada.) I was simply removing information that was by any standard unacceptable and uncredited.
:The word of one man is hardly a reliable source that you have cited. There was no election fraud. I simply erased it as it had no basis in fact. The election was verified by the Venezuelan government (without controversy claimed) and many international observers (including those from Canada.) I was simply removing information that was by any standard unacceptable and uncredited.
--[[User:Cidd11|Cidd11]] 17:23, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
--[[User:Cidd11|Cidd11]] 17:23, 16 October 2009 (EDT)
Once again I am removing the article on Election Fraud. I cannot stress the need for a reliable source on this subject. The opinion of one man does not constitute a reliable source. I also do not feel obligated to provide proof that he won the election as that would be a moot point towards this article. --[[User:Cidd11|Cidd11]] 12:02, 20 October 2009 (EDT)