Difference between revisions of "User talk:EvanW"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Do we have notability criteria?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Cat Cora ==
 
== Cat Cora ==
 
It's correct now because you changed it from her doing badly because she is gay to her marrying her partner. Plus, I don't think this person warrants inclusion. Trust me, Alphak is a vandal. [[User:Ameda|ameda]] 23:08, 15 November 2009 (EST)
 
It's correct now because you changed it from her doing badly because she is gay to her marrying her partner. Plus, I don't think this person warrants inclusion. Trust me, Alphak is a vandal. [[User:Ameda|ameda]] 23:08, 15 November 2009 (EST)
 +
:Agreed; he probably is.  But, I prefer keeping real information [[ad hominem|even if vandals add it]].  Notability is another matter, though - I know Wikipedia's policy, but does Conservapedia have one?  It doesn't seem to be in the Commandments or Guidelines.--[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 23:15, 15 November 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 04:15, November 16, 2009

Cat Cora

It's correct now because you changed it from her doing badly because she is gay to her marrying her partner. Plus, I don't think this person warrants inclusion. Trust me, Alphak is a vandal. ameda 23:08, 15 November 2009 (EST)

Agreed; he probably is. But, I prefer keeping real information even if vandals add it. Notability is another matter, though - I know Wikipedia's policy, but does Conservapedia have one? It doesn't seem to be in the Commandments or Guidelines.--EvanW 23:15, 15 November 2009 (EST)