Changes

===Unreported===

===Unreported===

Nearly all of the media has agreed with the premise that those email files were illegally stolen by computer hackers. However, there is some strong evidence to suggest the data was released by a fellow employee, a whistleblower within the CRU. According to JunkScience.com <ref>[http://www.junkscience.com Those "hacked" released CRU files..., JunkScience.com]</ref>   

Nearly all of the media and liberal [[Wikipedia]] have agreed with the premise that those email files were illegally stolen by computer hackers. However, there is some strong evidence to suggest the data was released by a fellow employee, a whistleblower within the CRU. According to JunkScience.com <ref>[http://www.junkscience.com Those "hacked" released CRU files..., JunkScience.com]</ref>   

* There was no "security breach" at CRU that "stole" these files

* There was no "security breach" at CRU that "stole" these files

The [[U.K.]] Daily Mail points out <ref>[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231763/BBC-weatherman-ignored-leaked-climate-row-emails.html BBC weatherman ‘ignored’ leaked climate row emails, DailyMailUK, November 28, 2009]</ref>

The [[U.K.]] Daily Mail points out <ref>[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231763/BBC-weatherman-ignored-leaked-climate-row-emails.html BBC weatherman ‘ignored’ leaked climate row emails, DailyMailUK, November 28, 2009]</ref>

{{cquote|''The BBC received copies of some of the CRU emails more than a month ago, but did nothing about them, sitting on explosive evidence of fraud.''}}  

{{cquote|''The BBC received copies of some of the CRU emails more than a month ago, but did nothing about them, sitting on explosive evidence of fraud.''}}

===Google===

===Google===