Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,206
edits
Changes
→Interesting, for your use: reply
[http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m5d7-Global-warming-common-sense-and-expert-opinion] --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:16, 20 December 2009 (EST)
[http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m5d7-Global-warming-common-sense-and-expert-opinion] --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:16, 20 December 2009 (EST)
:Thanks! It makes sense. Perhaps another section should be created to provide an overall outcome as a result of [[Climategate]], such as the necessary requirement that "[[Global warming]], to be accepted as a scientific hypothesis, it must include details of how to prove it wrong--'[[falsifiability]].'" I really hope the climate science community has learned from this (unfortunately politics and science are still holding hands, which is another clear need to change), so the article makes a great point. I'll look into this more when I return. Until then - Marry Christmas! [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 17:40, 23 December 2009 (EST)