Difference between revisions of "Pierson v. Ray"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(wikify)
Line 1: Line 1:
In '''''Pierson v. Ray''''', 386 U.S. 547 (1967), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended the protection of absolute [[judicial immunity]] to suits brought under § 1 of the [[Civil Rights Act of 1871]], 42 U.S.C. [[Section 1983]].  It held that the [[legislative record]] for that [[statute]] gave no indication that [[Congress]] intended to abolish this long-established principle of absolute judicial immunity.
+
<div style="text-decoration:blink; font-size: 1000%; font-weight:bold;">In '''''Pierson v. Ray''''', 386 U.S. 547 (1967), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended the protection of absolute [[judicial immunity]] to suits brought under § 1 of the [[Civil Rights Act of 1871]], 42 U.S.C. [[Section 1983]].  It held that the [[legislative record]] for that [[statute]] gave no indication that [[Congress]] intended to abolish this long-established principle of absolute judicial immunity.
  
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]  
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]  
 
[[category:Judicial Immunity]]
 
[[category:Judicial Immunity]]
 
[[category:Section 1983]]
 
[[category:Section 1983]]

Revision as of 13:33, December 25, 2009

In Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court extended the protection of absolute judicial immunity to suits brought under § 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. It held that the legislative record for that statute gave no indication that Congress intended to abolish this long-established principle of absolute judicial immunity.