Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open source (software)"
From Conservapedia
Tmtoulouse (Talk | contribs) |
Tim.thelion (Talk | contribs) (OSI) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Then it should be well sourced and qualified. As written it will not work as an encyclopedia article. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 19:07, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | :Then it should be well sourced and qualified. As written it will not work as an encyclopedia article. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 19:07, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == OSI == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force. | ||
Revision as of 04:15, March 30, 2007
I don't think that is vandalism. I have heard a number of conservatives make this argument before. --Jack 19:06, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
- Then it should be well sourced and qualified. As written it will not work as an encyclopedia article. Tmtoulouse 19:07, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
OSI
I don't think OSI should be talked abot. It is not the origin but merly a nopndominant governing force.
