36
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 299:
Line 299: +
Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words (view source)
Revision as of 19:26, January 12, 2010
, 19:26, January 12, 2010→Question about Methodology: It is a shame Khamilton didn't come back, I would have enjoyed seeing this conversation finished
::Thanks for your questions. Godspeed and I hope you really do have an open mind about this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:06, 12 June 2009 (EDT)
::Thanks for your questions. Godspeed and I hope you really do have an open mind about this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:06, 12 June 2009 (EDT)
:::Q6 seems really important to me, yes you are trying to fit to perfection but there may be something other than perfect geometirc growth going on and you may never be able to find it if you don't let the data flow where it may and then analyze it. While geometric growth is undeniably happening here there may be more to see that we will never find out unless we disconnect ourselves from the data. --14:26, 12 January 2010 (EST)
== More 1600's possibilities ==
== More 1600's possibilities ==