Changes

Line 109: Line 109:     
Im sure this was an earlier discussion, however why is it being on using the KJV as the baseline or comparator?  
 
Im sure this was an earlier discussion, however why is it being on using the KJV as the baseline or comparator?  
−
It seems that using a more literally accurate version as the baseline would be better, NASB for example.
+
It seems that using a more literally accurate version as the baseline would be better, NASB for example.
    
And why not have charts comparing the most common versus between the most common versions to see the supposed liberal bias, exp. KJV, NKJV, NIV, NASB, CBP?
 
And why not have charts comparing the most common versus between the most common versions to see the supposed liberal bias, exp. KJV, NKJV, NIV, NASB, CBP?
    
Also, what I am not clear on is why when it stated that original translation did not include a verse (exp. Father, forgive them, they no not what they do), why is the original translation not listed. And besides if some of these were true and in the oldest texts didn't include the stories or the verses then most translation would now have them bracketed (exp of Ethoiopian eunich being taken into the water to be baptized).
 
Also, what I am not clear on is why when it stated that original translation did not include a verse (exp. Father, forgive them, they no not what they do), why is the original translation not listed. And besides if some of these were true and in the oldest texts didn't include the stories or the verses then most translation would now have them bracketed (exp of Ethoiopian eunich being taken into the water to be baptized).
8

edits