Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes removed ,  05:45, March 31, 2007
m
no edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:  
* Berger's lies were far more extensive than previously revealed.
 
* Berger's lies were far more extensive than previously revealed.
 
* That no full assessment of the damage to national security has been conducted.
 
* That no full assessment of the damage to national security has been conducted.
* That the Justice Department, in a break with precedent and procedure, relied on Berger’s statements despite a record that showed a history of lies.
+
* That the Justice Department, in a break with precedent and procedure, relied on Berger's statements despite a record that showed a history of lies.
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
*[http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/145uivdz.asp The New McCarthyism, A look at the CIA leaker's independent streak and the al-Shifa intelligence], Thomas Joscelyn, The Weekly Standard, 04/25/2006.
 
*[http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/145uivdz.asp The New McCarthyism, A look at the CIA leaker's independent streak and the al-Shifa intelligence], Thomas Joscelyn, The Weekly Standard, 04/25/2006.
 
*[http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/06/98061701_tpo.html BERGER APPOINTS MCCARTHY SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR INTELLIGENCE], USIS Washington File, 17 June 1998.
 
*[http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/06/98061701_tpo.html BERGER APPOINTS MCCARTHY SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR INTELLIGENCE], USIS Washington File, 17 June 1998.
227

edits

Navigation menu