Changes

669 bytes removed ,  16:18, March 31, 2007
no edit summary
Line 372: Line 372:  
Check it out at [[User_talk:Sid_3050#Stubs]], might be worth a good chuckle. ;) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 20:35, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Check it out at [[User_talk:Sid_3050#Stubs]], might be worth a good chuckle. ;) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 20:35, 30 March 2007 (EDT)
   −
== Revert war over maintenance ==
+
:I'm very sorry for your situation, but I can't see how you can blame me. How did you help me?  And how did I get you banned?  Who banned you? If there is anyone to blame, it is those who jumped to conclusions when they saw the edits. And trust me, I'm not "chuckling"... --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 12:18, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
−
 
  −
(sigh) Requesting sysop assistance because [[User:TK|TK]] is creating a double redirect:
  −
*[[TKarchive1]] -> [[User talk:TerryK/TKarchive1]] -> [[User talk:TK/TKarchive1]]
  −
I have attempted to fix this double redirect two times, and both got reverted by TK. I assume he sees my routine repair as an attack on his User Talk page, so I need sysop authority to get the permission to fix things. The page is now also protected in its broken state, so I definitely need a sysop now.
  −
 
  −
So: I officially request the opinion of sysops [[User:Aschlafly]], [[User:TK]], [[User:Conservative]], [[User:CPAdmin1]], [[User:CPWebmaster]], [[User:Ed Poor]], [[User:David_R]], [[User:AustinM]], [[User:Geo.plrd]], and [[User:Tsumetai]] to get a poll of roughly 33% of all sysops for this undoubtedly critical change to a User page.
  −
 
  −
All replies should be left at [[User_talk:Sid_3050#Double_Redirect_Poll]] for easier evaluation of the results. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 09:50, 31 March 2007 (EDT)