Changes

397 bytes added ,  14:59, May 12, 2010
no edit summary
Line 185: Line 185:  
::::I could refute alot of things you said there but I'll stay on topic.  By natural I mean the view that relies on natural processes rather than supernatural.  The article already goes with this.  It says "Most scientists today conclude that the Earth formed by natural processes, specifically by the accumulation of debris orbiting the sun billions of years in the past."  {{unsigned|Glorfon}}
 
::::I could refute alot of things you said there but I'll stay on topic.  By natural I mean the view that relies on natural processes rather than supernatural.  The article already goes with this.  It says "Most scientists today conclude that the Earth formed by natural processes, specifically by the accumulation of debris orbiting the sun billions of years in the past."  {{unsigned|Glorfon}}
 
::::: You could ''try'' refuting a lot of the things I said, but whether you refutations would be correct is another matter.  The view that ''relies on'' natural processes is ''naturalism'', the ''belief'' that everything can be/must be explained by natural processes.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:56, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: You could ''try'' refuting a lot of the things I said, but whether you refutations would be correct is another matter.  The view that ''relies on'' natural processes is ''naturalism'', the ''belief'' that everything can be/must be explained by natural processes.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:56, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Oh my god, this is the most ridicuolus encyclopedia I've ever seen. I can't belive people like conservants actually exist. You really belive Earth has been created in six days? Holy crap, you must be crazy. I looked at the main page and I saw the news; Obama a socialist? Ahah, this is totally funny. You've got a closed mind.--[[User:Uncyclopediauser|Uncyclopediauser]] 10:59, 12 May 2010 (EDT)