14
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 231:
Line 231: + +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 21:36, March 31, 2007
, 21:36, March 31, 2007→Commandment #1 needs to be clarified in the article.
On a related note, I don't see any policy one way or the other regarding original research. Wikipedia has a policy banning it; does the same rule obtain here? Inquiring minds would like to know. [[User:Niwrad|Niwrad]] 00:36, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
On a related note, I don't see any policy one way or the other regarding original research. Wikipedia has a policy banning it; does the same rule obtain here? Inquiring minds would like to know. [[User:Niwrad|Niwrad]] 00:36, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
Furthermore - you would have to show it is vandalism. Imagine trying to prove that a non-creationist but factually correct post was 'vandalism' in a court of law. I think it may well cause a laugh or too but certainly no penalty.
== Poll on Proposed Copyright Policy ==
== Poll on Proposed Copyright Policy ==