Changes

287 bytes added ,  20:54, May 31, 2010
Line 370: Line 370:  
On the subject of ulterior motive, what ulterior motive is there? None that I can see. The only reason why many people would favor liberalism is for ideological reasons, which implies that they do in fact believe in what they preach. On the subject of biblical standards, many liberals would see biblical standards as the reason why they act. A misinterpretation perhaps, but at least this proves that they're philosophy is not imply based on rejecting biblical standards. For example, Steven Colbert in his book, writes that the bible is the foundation of moral belief, meaning that he bases his philosophy on what he reads in the bible.
 
On the subject of ulterior motive, what ulterior motive is there? None that I can see. The only reason why many people would favor liberalism is for ideological reasons, which implies that they do in fact believe in what they preach. On the subject of biblical standards, many liberals would see biblical standards as the reason why they act. A misinterpretation perhaps, but at least this proves that they're philosophy is not imply based on rejecting biblical standards. For example, Steven Colbert in his book, writes that the bible is the foundation of moral belief, meaning that he bases his philosophy on what he reads in the bible.
 
--[[User:Double Edge|Double Edge]] 16:43, 31 May 2010 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Double Edge|Double Edge]] 16:43, 31 May 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
On a final note, the citation for the existing definition is hardly credible (it comes from a liberal website) and completely non-topical (it harps about Barack Obama, not about liberal philosophy or even liberals in general.
 +
--[[User:Double Edge|Double Edge]] 16:54, 31 May 2010 (EDT)
    
==Reversion==
 
==Reversion==
Block, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta
289

edits