Difference between revisions of "Talk:Huffington Post"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Well, do you know what point of view Conservapedia stands for? Nothing in the title of the Huffinpuffin Post tells me they are liberal. Maybe it's because of deceit that they hide behind objectivity when in fact liberal.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:00, 5 June 2010 (EDT) | :Well, do you know what point of view Conservapedia stands for? Nothing in the title of the Huffinpuffin Post tells me they are liberal. Maybe it's because of deceit that they hide behind objectivity when in fact liberal.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:00, 5 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::At least Conservapedia admits its POV, proudly proclaims it, Acwellman. We don't offer ours under the cloud of deceit that the HuffPo uses. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 12:42, 6 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:42, June 6, 2010
Hmm...Conservapedia accuses The Huffington Post of delivering "one sided news". Isn't Conservapedia kind of one sided? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Acwellman (talk)
- Well, do you know what point of view Conservapedia stands for? Nothing in the title of the Huffinpuffin Post tells me they are liberal. Maybe it's because of deceit that they hide behind objectivity when in fact liberal.--Jpatt 12:00, 5 June 2010 (EDT)