Difference between revisions of "General theory of evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (ext. link) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''general theory of evolution''' says that, " | The '''general theory of evolution''' says that, " | ||
| − | <ref>This ‘General Theory of Evolution’ (GTE) was defined by the evolutionist Kerkut as ‘the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.’ -- Kerkut, G.A., ''Implications of Evolution'', Pergamon, Oxford, UK, p. 157, 1960. He continued: ‘the evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.’</ref> | + | <ref>This ‘General Theory of Evolution’ (GTE) was defined by the evolutionist Kerkut as ‘the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.’ -- Kerkut, G.A., ''Implications of Evolution'', Pergamon, Oxford, UK, p. 157, 1960. He continued: ‘the evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.’ [http://creation.com/whos-really-pushing-bad-science-rebuttal-to-lawrence-s-lerner#r1]</ref> |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 19:20, July 30, 2010
The general theory of evolution says that, " [1]
Notes
- ↑ This ‘General Theory of Evolution’ (GTE) was defined by the evolutionist Kerkut as ‘the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.’ -- Kerkut, G.A., Implications of Evolution, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, p. 157, 1960. He continued: ‘the evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.’ [1]