Changes

763 bytes added ,  08:48, August 16, 2010
Line 14: Line 14:     
Behe and others have stated that Intelligent Design is not religious in nature but in the [[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District|Dover trial]], Judge John E. Jones III, a [[Republican]] and a [[US Federal District Judge]], ruled as a one of his findings that Intelligent Design was essentially religious in nature.  The opinion borrowed heavily from the ACLU's briefs. <ref>[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330]</ref>
 
Behe and others have stated that Intelligent Design is not religious in nature but in the [[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District|Dover trial]], Judge John E. Jones III, a [[Republican]] and a [[US Federal District Judge]], ruled as a one of his findings that Intelligent Design was essentially religious in nature.  The opinion borrowed heavily from the ACLU's briefs. <ref>[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330]</ref>
 +
== Creationist countering evolutionist/atheist cyberbullying  ==
 +
 +
There is a widespread problem with atheist cyberbullying on [[YouTube]] toward [[Christian]] and [[creationism|creationist]] YouTube channels.  [[CreationWiki]] has developed a web page entitled [http://creationwiki.org/Anticreationist_youtube_debate_tactics Anticreationist youtube debate tactics] designed to show creationists how to thwart atheist/evolutionist cyberbullies.  Also, one popular Christian YouTube channel, [[shockofgod]], was shut down several times by atheist cyberbullying through false reports.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kax-zAJxi-U</ref> These false reports are not isolated incidents, many atheists will try this deceitful tactic to block out [[creation science]].
    
== Adherents and Opponents of Creationism ==
 
== Adherents and Opponents of Creationism ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,435

edits