1,590
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 57:
Line 57: +
→Edits to Virgin Birth
:::::::::"I assumed you would be referring to the article itself, since if a claim is made on a talk page ''but isn't presented in any way in the article'' (which you seem to agree that it's not) then it's irrelevant. Even on this page, Wycliffe states that it is still a point of dispute. Is there anything more you want? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 15:34, 31 December 2010 (EST)
:::::::::"I assumed you would be referring to the article itself, since if a claim is made on a talk page ''but isn't presented in any way in the article'' (which you seem to agree that it's not) then it's irrelevant. Even on this page, Wycliffe states that it is still a point of dispute. Is there anything more you want? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 15:34, 31 December 2010 (EST)
::::::::::You're not reading what I wrote. It's a false claim. He hasn't justified it. All he did was state it and say there's a dispute. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:55, 31 December 2010 (EST)
::::::::::You're not reading what I wrote. It's a false claim. He hasn't justified it. All he did was state it and say there's a dispute. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 15:55, 31 December 2010 (EST)
:::::::::::Then go find us some proof that it's false, please. I'm genuinely curious now. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] <sup>[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]</sup> 16:22, 31 December 2010 (EST)