88
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 21:30, April 3, 2007
, 21:30, April 3, 2007→Item #3
::::"Concede my point already, only then will you get to hear me prove it." ...um, yeah, how about you just pretend we do and get on with it already? Hey, pretending people agree with you should come easy to ya, right?
::::"Concede my point already, only then will you get to hear me prove it." ...um, yeah, how about you just pretend we do and get on with it already? Hey, pretending people agree with you should come easy to ya, right?
::::--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 15:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::::--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 15:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:::: Aschlafly is simply being provocative and seeking to generate interest in this site in the mold of Ann Coulter. Don't take him too seriously. That is why he put the bit about sex on the main page, to titulate. That is why he says stuff like "There is a pro-pornography bias on Wikipedia, and this is correlated to a liberal bias. " to inflame. And that is why he answer direct questions about obvious holes in his arguments with personal and generally ridiculous attacks, to deflect. The man is simply a radical, faux-christian impressario with bad manners, poor judgment and , at best, tenuous grasp of the truth -- he certainly doesn't rely on it much. My real concern is for the children apparently under his tutelage. They are in for a rude awakening if they ever extract themselves from hate-filled network of lies, half-truths and half-baked ideas about anything he doesn't like or understand. [[User:Godman|Godman]] 17:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT)