Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 118: Line 118:     
: Your improvements are superb.  But I didn't know that "Gee whiz" was a secularization of "Jesus"!  I'd be inclined to leave that in for informative purposes, even though you're reason for deleting it is probably.  Perhaps with a footnote?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:19, 26 February 2011 (EST)
 
: Your improvements are superb.  But I didn't know that "Gee whiz" was a secularization of "Jesus"!  I'd be inclined to leave that in for informative purposes, even though you're reason for deleting it is probably.  Perhaps with a footnote?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:19, 26 February 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
:: I can certainly see your point as far as the informative value, and this isn't, after all, just supposed to be an article about language that was secularized for malicious reasons.  It seems like we really do need a section exploring possible reasons for the secularization of language, and the ways in which even benign motives can contribute to the trend.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 15:20, 26 February 2011 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,253

edits

Navigation menu