161
edits
Changes
no edit summary
::I see nothing abusive, maybe I'm just partial to editors who boldly take on controversial subjects. Asking for cites would be beneficial, like for this claim [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Iran&diff=next&oldid=38351], "With Iran's assistance, Hezbollah launched terrorist attacks even against such clearly inoffensive countries as [[Argentina]]"; such properly sourced information would be invaluable. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:13, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::I see nothing abusive, maybe I'm just partial to editors who boldly take on controversial subjects. Asking for cites would be beneficial, like for this claim [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Iran&diff=next&oldid=38351], "With Iran's assistance, Hezbollah launched terrorist attacks even against such clearly inoffensive countries as [[Argentina]]"; such properly sourced information would be invaluable. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:13, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::I see no real abuse, much of the material is similar to Wikipedia, but there is no real direct copy and paste from what I can see. I would also agree with RobS that citations would be nice.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 20:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
::I see no real abuse, much of the material is similar to Wikipedia, but there is no real direct copy and paste from what I can see. I would also agree with RobS that citations would be nice.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 20:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
#{{user|CoulterMan}} - Seems to make habit of cut-and-paste from other sources; see, for example, his entry here for Sam Johnson versus that of Wikipedia's. Also seems prone to edit wars and non-factual assertions, but that's a whole other issue. A word to the wise, perhaps?--[[User:WJThomas|WJThomas]] 14:19, 4 April 2007 (EDT)