Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sillybear25"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
um, no, it's not. What's wrong with leetspeak? it doesn't violate the commandments at all...
 
um, no, it's not. What's wrong with leetspeak? it doesn't violate the commandments at all...
 +
 +
I think that she's upset that you took out the "Links to paganism" section in the Islam article.--[[User:Epicurius|Epicurius]] 19:17, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:17, April 4, 2007

101z 7h4nkz


Stop hand.svg Block Notice
Edits you have made violate The Conservapedia Commandments. Further violations may result in your username being blocked.

um, no, it's not. What's wrong with leetspeak? it doesn't violate the commandments at all...

I think that she's upset that you took out the "Links to paganism" section in the Islam article.--Epicurius 19:17, 4 April 2007 (EDT)