Difference between revisions of "Talk:Intelligent design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy == | == [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy == | ||
| − | The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. | + | The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. ~ |
Revision as of 07:02, April 10, 2011
| ! | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | 
|
| ! | Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism. Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop. |
|
Talk:Intelligent design/Archive-1
More evidence of intelligent design
I would add this article giving more evidence of an intelligent designer at work. Martyp 11:05, 30 January 2011 (EST)
[1] is a logical fallacy
The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. ~